In previous work with Fehm we found that the existential theory of an equicharacteristic henselian valued field is axiomatised using the existential theory of its residue field. From this we deduced a transfer of decidability: for a complete theory $T$ of residue fields, the existential consequences of $T$ are decidable if and only if the existential consequences of the theory $H(T)$ are decidable, where $H(T)$ is 'equicharacteristic, henselian, and residue field models $T^{\prime}$. In more recent work with Dittmann and Fehm we considered a similar problem in which $H(T)$ is expanded to a theory that distinguishes a uniformizer, using an additional constant symbol. In this case Denef and Schoutens gave a transfer of existential decidability conditional on Resolution of Singularities. We introduce a consequence of Resolution and prove that it implies a similar transfer of existential decidability.In this talk I'll explain these results and describe ongoing work with Fehm in which we broaden the above setting to obtain versions of these transfer results that allow incomplete theories $T$. Consequently we find several existential theories Turing equivalent to the existential theory of $\mathbb{Q}$, including the existential theory of large fields.
By Arthur Forey
By Sylvy Anscombe
By Raf Cluckers
By Pablo Cubides Kovacsics
By Lothar Sebastian Krapp
By Michal Szachniewicz
By Ya'acov Peterzil
By Mariana Vicaria
By Matthias Aschenbrenner
By Philip Dittmann
By Adele Padgett
By Juan Camilo Arosemena Serrato
By Pieter Spaas
By Victor Kleptsyn
By Joaquin Brum
By Juan Camilo Arosemena Serrato
By Albert Schwarz
By Pieter Spaas
By Francesca Arici
By Amine Marrakchi
