Appears in collection : 2024 - T3 - WS1 - Deployment of post-quantum cryptography

It is well-accepted that with PQ KEMs, in particular ML-KEM, we need to move with urgency, and that we should deploy ML-KEM in hybrid with RSA or ECC to protect against potential algorithmic attacks. Is the same true of PQ signatures, in particular ML-DSA? We will explore the arguments why or why not. We will then explore several IETF Internet-Drafts for PQ hybrids and other PQ migration mechanisms for PKI on which the presenter is a primary author: CompositeML-DSA, CompositeML-KEM, Alt Public Keys, Chameleon certificates, external public keys, RelatedCertificateDestriptor, and of course simple multiple certificate approaches.

Information about the video

Citation data

  • DOI 10.57987/IHP.2024.T3.WS1.006
  • Cite this video Ounsworth, Mike (08/10/2024). Quantum-safe signatures: Hybrid or not? Delay or not?. IHP. Audiovisual resource. DOI: 10.57987/IHP.2024.T3.WS1.006
  • URL https://dx.doi.org/10.57987/IHP.2024.T3.WS1.006

Last related questions on MathOverflow

You have to connect your Carmin.tv account with mathoverflow to add question

Ask a question on MathOverflow




Register

  • Bookmark videos
  • Add videos to see later &
    keep your browsing history
  • Comment with the scientific
    community
  • Get notification updates
    for your favorite subjects
Give feedback